|
|
| Fusion test pilot | ||||||
 |
||||||
| Previous Image | Next Image | ||||||
|
Description: Fusion with a bocker trying them on. Their was a problem with them so all the could do was walk the where heavy with all the extra braket and joints needed for the second spring.
Picture Stats: Views: 5515 Filesize: 254.84kB Height: 555 Width: 415 Keywords: fusion Posted by: Guest at January 24, 2009, 04:17:13 AM Image Linking Codes
|
||||||
| 0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this picture. |
| Guest | January 30, 2009, 11:01:17 AM You cant get out what you don't put in. You have to be strong to use these ! |
| aidanh1 Posts:1421 | January 30, 2009, 01:06:10 AM there cool DK i well want a go at trying to even bend them  dk why dont u work on sumthing that will double the height limit when jumping  mabe add some old fasion springs to give it the extra UMF without the harder work |
| Guest | January 26, 2009, 08:28:55 PM I'm talking to someone who's going to make me a bigger spring ! Most users pick a spring 20Kg of their weight but I'm 105Kg ans would like a 30Kg bigger but on one makes them ( yet ! ). Why should we ban bigger people from the joy of Bocking. Not everyone want to backflip and just like the idea of bouncing. Their not meant for light weight people a single spring works fine for them. 2 spring allow the up limit to be broken and give more people the chance to bock. I new pair I'll be making are lighter !? |
| Trixter Posts:1187 | January 26, 2009, 07:43:49 PM they look good but seem slightly pointless at the same time will they be made for lighter bockers as i can see me having a problem using the springs that are doubled up and if the stilts are made to weight is there a point in using 2 springs over one |
| lynch Posts:269 | January 25, 2009, 03:32:58 PM they look cool and i like the projumps in the back ground lol |
| Spud Posts:5200 
| January 25, 2009, 02:24:11 AM Not my place to say but I think fusions were a design modded for 2 springs. I think the new ones should be designed around having 2 springs. Tink thats what you have planned actually. |
| Guest | January 25, 2009, 12:31:51 AM I have to admit I cut some corners in the design of this test pair. include not making brakets for the springs. The springs was fix in three places to the frame that's not including the hoofs and the whole spring had reinforced webbing tape along it making the two springs act like one. The size of the hoof meant there was little side kick. They where after all just a test to learn from and where to improve things for DNA which I hope you'll find more refined version  |
| sprog Posts:1622 
| January 24, 2009, 11:33:39 PM That's what I've argued all along Wolf, it needs to be along the middle, between the two springs, rather than one with another just bolted on the side. With the current setup all the pressure is going into the inner spring, with little reaching the outer spring. The fact they're also off centre means the bounce back is going to force your legs together too as you jump. |
| wolf Posts:93 
| January 24, 2009, 10:15:56 PM they look really funky but does having the extra spring on the side make them unbalanced? what I mean is shouldn't the foot part attach to both springs to allow you to push down on both equally? |
| Guest | January 24, 2009, 05:04:56 PM I'd been using them that morning and the hoops had come loose. The problem with Fusions hoops where they only had one pole so could work loose. But the " Hookies " problem was soloved by a tape holding it from sliding open. |
| Fysh Posts:200 
| January 24, 2009, 03:29:25 PM they look immense... what was the problem? A video would be nice  |
Powered by: SMF Gallery